Quantcast
Channel: Richard Bammer – The Mercury News
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 46

Feds seek to stop California prisons from violating guards’ religious beliefs

$
0
0

The U.S. Department of Justice on Monday challenged the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation for its denial of religious exceptions for correctional officers of various faiths, including Sikhs and Muslims, who wear facial hair as an expression of their faith.

U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, who leads the DOJ's Eastern District of California in Sacramento (U.S. DOJ)
U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, who leads the DOJ’s Eastern District of California in Sacramento (U.S. DOJ) 

CDCR generally bans prison guards from wearing beards, and the action seeks a temporary court order allowing those officers to wear beards while prison officials study ways to provide them with religious accommodations while still complying with state safety regulations.

“Our district is one of the most diverse in the country, with communities of many different faiths practicing customs that are central to their beliefs,” U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, who leads the DOJ’s Eastern District of California in Sacramento, said in a press statement.

“The action brought today is an important use of the federal civil rights laws to protect this religious expression,”  he added. “My office will continue to work hand in hand with the (DOJ’s) Civil Rights Division to ensure that individuals of all faiths can receive due consideration for appropriate religious accommodations at workplaces in this District.”

The department’s action, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District, alleges that although many officers had performed their jobs successfully for years while wearing facial hair, CDCR implemented a revised facial hair policy last year.

Since then, however, state prison officials have repeatedly denied religious accommodation requests, forcing officers to shave their beards or lose their jobs, according to Talbert.

The affected officers have been forced to violate core tenets of their faiths and have “suffered shame and humiliation among their religious communities, including being shunned from houses of worship and denied participation in religious ceremonies, such as family weddings,” he added in the prepared statement.

If the DOJ’s case is successfully adjudicated and upheld, it will affect prison employees at 36 adult instutions statewide, including two in Vacaville: California State Prison, Solano, and the California Medical Facility, the latter a prison for inmates who require medical treatment for chronic illnesses, mental health problems, or injuries requiring specialized care.

“Sikhs, Muslims and employees of other minority faiths should not be forced to choose between the practice of their faith and their jobs,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said of the legal filing. “Religious freedom and religious accommodation are bedrock principles of our democracy.

“We are taking action to ensure that the rights of employees of minority faiths are respected and accommodated in the workplace,” she added. “As faith communities celebrate Ramadan and other important holidays across religions in the coming weeks, the Justice Department will continue to combat religious discrimination in the workplace.” (Ramadan, the Muslim holy month, marked by daily fasting from dawn to sunset, ends April 9.)

Talbert said the DOJ’s complaint alleges that state prison officials have “failed to meaningfully consider the range of options proposed by the charging parties or those used by other correctional institutions to accommodate officers’ religious beliefs while meeting safety requirements.”

The department is asking the district court to order CDCR to stop enforcing its facial hair policy against officers who request to wear a beard because of their religious beliefs and engage in good faith discussions with officers about possible reasonable accommodations that would allow officers to safely do their jobs and adhere to their religious beliefs.

Since CDCR implemented its revised facial hair policy, numerous officers have filed charges of religious discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Because the EEOC’s investigation remains ongoing, the department is seeking relief in its requested court order only until the EEOC finishes its full investigation or until CDCR can otherwise show the court it has met its religious accommodation obligations under Title VII, said Talbert.

Attorneys handling the case include DOJ trial attorneys Alicia Johnson and Sharion Scott of the Civil Rights Division’s Employment Litigation Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert Fuentes of the Eastern District of California.

Employees with complaints of religious discrimination can report them to their local EEOC office or their state or local fair employment practices agencies. The contact information for each local EEOC office can be found at www.eeoc.gov/field-office.

The full and fair enforcement of Title VII is “a top priority” of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Talbert wrote in the news release.

Lt. Joseph Guerrero, the public information officer at California State Prison, Solano, was unaware DOJ’s legal filing and declined to comment.

Alia Cruz, a public information officer for CDCR officials in Sacramento, did not return a request for comment at press time Monday afternoon.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 46

Trending Articles